| Sex, Gender, Attraction and Prejudice |
[Nov. 10th, 2009|11:19 pm] |
I've been pondering these issues a little of late. A post today by faerierhona, and some other discussions about identity and orientation, reminded me of a recent post in the community section of Feministing, 'Having Sex While Stealth Is Not Sexual Assault', which made a number of very good points about how the trope of trans people as "deceptive" is perpetuated under the guise of promoting 'honesty' in relationships. Sadly but predictably, it contained some pretty transphobic comments. Notably, a particularly head-breaking piece of double-think came up, wherein a number of people tried to claim that their orientation was "cissexual", or even "heterocissexual" (say that 3 times fast!), and that there was absolutely nothing wrong with not being attracted to trans people, it was just their sexual orientation, they weren't prejudiced at all, some of their best friends were trans, blah blah.
There's a bit of a problem with that construction: "trans" is not, in itself, a specific sex or gender, and nor is it a sexual orientation. So claiming that your sexual orientation excludes trans people is rather like claiming you're a "thinsexual", and only people below a certain BMI can excite you, and it's some sort of natural, hard-wired aspect of your personality, not conditioning at all, oh no. If you are otherwise attracted to people whose sex and gender presentation are within the usual scope for your attraction, but are not or would not be attracted to such a person because of a trans identity or history, then your attractions are being influenced by transphobia. This is not to say that any transphobic actions are deliberately being undertaken, but to point out that transphobia has an effect on how people understand their attractions (and, frankly, this in itself is quite relevant to trans people in terms of stealthness v. outness).
Before anyone runs away and assumes that I'm saying that anyone who isn't attracted to a trans person is a hateful bigot, or worse, I'd like to make very clear: nobody is ever obligated to feel attraction, or behave as if they feel it, with anyone, not least because it sucks for the other person who thinks they're a genuine recipient of interest. I know I have no interest in being a pity fuck, and I'm sure a lot of other people feel the same. Even if one's choices are being influenced by a prejudiced culture, it's often difficult for individuals to see that, or if they do see it to do anything about it. And what they should be doing isn't always clear. But what they shouldn't be doing, I propose, is claiming that their prejudices are in fact beyond their control and outside of culture or influence.
And I'm not just talking about gender presentation. Gender presentation in and of itself is not a specifically trans issue. This is an aesthetic matter. But liking bears and not twinks is a matter of taste, and not necessarily anything further. Some people adore femme, some think it's a lot of fannydangle. However, not liking trans people *does* go further, and not just because a lot of assumptions about trans people focus on extreme ideas of gender presentation which are quite far outside the norm. So simply not being attracted to people who are genderqueer, or androgynous, or otherwise are confounding gender roles visibly, is also not the same as not being attracted to trans people.
Let us, for a moment, think about a lovely pretty boy* in eyeliner and a cute skirt. I know this is an image which appeals to quite a few of you ;-) Now, many people like boys regardless of such accoutrements, and others are really very specifically keen on boys in eyeliner and cute skirts. So far, so much visual flirtation. But suppose, for a moment, that you, whoever you are, have met and are attracted to said boy. Then said boy tells you he is in fact a trans man. Heavens! Does this put you off? If your attraction dissipates at the news, then well done, you've just told him that in the eyes of your libido, he's not a "real" man. Because, despite meeting what are otherwise your gender preferences, his transness terminates his worthiness as a lust object in your eyes. He doesn't count where it matters. Or even where it *doesn't* matter. In the case of trans women, commenters on the original thread responded to claims of "my orientation means I am not attracted to this configuration of genitals" by pointing out that, for post-operative trans women, the observer (allow me to presume for a moment that they are not a cosmetic surgeon or otherwise particularly expert) would not be able to tell any difference even from looking very closely. So there is NO determinable physical difference between the trans and the cis women to whom they are attracted, save for the non-visible fact of transness. However you slice it, I don't think you can have a sexual orientation based on something invisible!
In conclusion: if the knowledge that someone is trans would prevent a person being attracted to someone, or would end their attraction if they had been interested, then I'm afraid some part of their psyche is being transphobic. One doesn't necessarily need to do any particular THING about it - although I think that pondering it in-depth would be a good start - and it's probably not useful to get overcome with guilt instead of working to overcome guilt and be a bit more open-minded, but please, for the love of small furry rodents, let's STOP with the bullshit about how it's an "orientation" and therefore has some kind of protected status. Let's recognise that standards of beauty are highly cultural and often kind of crazy and actually try to do something about them (as has already happened to a small but important degree re: things like race, size, disability, etc), instead of just subscribing to the horribly victim-blaming idea that it's all trans people's fault for being trans/stealth/both to begin with.
TBH, I really just don't get this concept, so I'm extrapolating from reason and not inclination here. But then, I don't really get "shells" as a definition of a person to begin with. Of course, if they were a 50 foot mecha, my attraction to their "shell" might be a little above average, but only if they let me have a go at stomping.
*If you're really having terrible problems imagining this, feel free to exchange "boy" for "girl" and "man" for "woman" in your head. I think you might be even less visual a thinker than me, if so, though. |
|
|